Ability to enunciate, project my voice and content in a consistent and fluent manner.
The smoothness of the presentation and specificity of the activity for programming.
2. a. What assessment would you give yourself on your Lesson 2 Presentation (self-assessment)?
P/AE
b. Explain why you deserve that grade using evidence from the Lesson 2 component contract.
- Met all the "P" requirements.
- Professionalism: Was able to clearly and consciously explain all topics well. Commendations include "Your presentation was very interesting and engaging," "Coding example was very clear and fun to learn about."
- Organizations and Creativity: Effectively used all the provided time to cover all materiel and complete activity
- Justification of Answer: Content was very in depth with more than the required sources and examples. 5 printed sources used throughout the presentation and mentor mentioned multiple times. 8 references of real life examples of my content. Commendation include "You show you know a lot about your topic."
- Audience Involvement: Directly connected activity to content and Answer #1. Instructions and objective of activity were clear and direct. Commendations include "Activity was very engaging." Debrief included engagement of audience as well (showing their code on screen)
- Defining the activity clearly and having people actually be able to code a simple website.
- Using all the time I was provided with.
- Explaining HTML code
4. What didn't work? If you had a time machine, what would you have done differently to improve your Lesson 2?
- I would practice more to avoid slight stuttering
- Mention mentorship experience more
5. What do you think your answer #2 is going to be?
- Being able to establish common knowledge or information about the application's objective with the customer. (need to re-word it)
No comments:
Post a Comment